History of Science

Did Isaac Newton Believe in God?

Newton wrote approximately 1.3 million words on theology — roughly twice as many as he wrote on physics and mathematics combined. He taught himself Hebrew and ancient Greek to read scripture in its original form. He spent decades trying to decode the prophecies of Daniel and Revelation. By any reasonable measure, his religious life was at least as serious as his scientific one. It was also, in one crucial respect, a secret he kept for his entire career.

The short answer

Yes — Newton was deeply and genuinely religious, describing himself as a Christian and believing that his scientific work revealed the design of a creator God. However, he privately rejected the doctrine of the Trinity — the belief that Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are co-equal parts of one God — which was not only heretical but potentially criminal in 17th-century England. He never made this view public during his lifetime.

Editorial illustration of Newton studying the Bible alongside his scientific manuscripts

Words on theology

Approximately 1.3 million — more than he wrote on physics and mathematics combined

Languages learned for scripture

Hebrew and ancient Greek, studied specifically to read the Bible in its original form

His view of science

Newton believed physics revealed God's design — gravity, to him, required a divine maintainer

The secret

Newton privately rejected the Trinity — a heresy that could have cost him his career and liberty

Published theology

Observations on the Prophecies of Daniel and the Apocalypse of St John — published posthumously in 1733

The verdict

Verdict

Newton believed in God profoundly — but not in the God of official Christianity

Confidence95%

The evidence is overwhelming that Newton was sincerely religious and that his faith was not incidental to his science but intertwined with it. He believed the mathematical order he was uncovering was evidence of divine design. He wrote to correspondents that gravity could not exist without God's active maintenance of the universe. He spent more time on theology than on physics across his lifetime. But the theology he privately held — rejecting the Trinity, doubting the divinity of Christ, suspecting that the early Church had corrupted scripture — was heterodox enough that he concealed it throughout his career. Newton's God was real, singular, and all-powerful. The Trinitarian God of the Church of England was, in his private view, a theological error.

Useful analogy

Newton's position was something like a person who is deeply patriotic and loves their country but has privately concluded that its founding document contains a significant error — an error introduced by people with political motives centuries ago. They don't stop loving the country. They don't announce their view, because the consequences would be severe. But they never stop believing they are right.

The catch

Newton's anti-Trinitarian views were not widely known until his theological manuscripts were examined after his death — and even then were largely suppressed until the 20th century. The economist John Maynard Keynes, who purchased many of Newton's private papers at auction in 1936, described him as 'the last of the magicians' and was struck by how different the private Newton was from the public one. The scientific saint of official history had spent his life holding views that could have destroyed him.

Newton's Christianity

What religion was Isaac Newton — and what did he actually believe?

Newton was raised in the Church of England and remained outwardly Anglican throughout his life. He was elected a fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge — a position that, in 1667, required taking holy orders in the Anglican Church. Newton avoided this requirement through an unusual royal dispensation granted specifically to the Lucasian Professor of Mathematics — a dispensation he had lobbied for, almost certainly because he already knew his private beliefs were incompatible with ordination.

What Newton privately believed was a form of Christianity that rejected the Council of Nicaea (AD 325), at which the doctrine of the Trinity was formally established. Newton's historical research led him to conclude that Trinitarian doctrine was not present in the original scriptures but had been introduced by Athanasius and others for political reasons. In Newton's reading, Jesus was a being of a higher order than man but not co-equal with God — a view known as Arianism, after the 4th-century theologian Arius, and one that had been declared heretical since 381 AD.

Newton never published these views. He communicated them cautiously to a handful of trusted correspondents. His theological manuscripts — running to hundreds of thousands of words — were kept private and remained unpublished at his death. He understood perfectly well what public disclosure would have meant.

Science and God

How did Newton's science and religion relate to each other?

For Newton, the two were not in tension — they were aspects of the same inquiry. He believed that the mathematical order he found in nature was direct evidence of a designer, and that uncovering that order was a form of worship. When Leibniz criticised Newton's theory of gravity on the grounds that action at a distance was philosophically incoherent — how could one object affect another with nothing between them? — Newton's response was essentially theological: God maintains it. Gravity works because God makes it work.

This is sometimes read as a gap-filling move — invoking God where physics ran out. Newton probably saw it differently. For him, the universe required active divine maintenance because a universe running purely on mechanical principles, without ongoing divine involvement, would be the universe of the materialists — the atheists. Newton was not an atheist. He was, if anything, more intensely focused on God's presence in nature than most of his contemporaries.

His Opticks ends with a set of 'Queries' — open questions about the nature of light and matter — that shade, by the final pages, into natural theology. Newton's scientific writing is full of language that assumes a creator. This was not rhetorical decoration. He meant it.

The Trinity

Did Isaac Newton reject the Trinity — and why did it matter?

What people think

Newton's religious views were conventional for his time and compatible with his scientific reputation

The standard picture of Newton as a devout Anglican whose science and faith coexisted peacefully is broadly how he presented himself in public — and how he has often been presented since.

What actually happens

Newton privately held views that were heretical and potentially criminal

Anti-Trinitarian belief — the denial that Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are co-equal persons in one God — was not merely theologically controversial in 17th-century England. The Blasphemy Act of 1698 made denying the Trinity a criminal offence. Newton held, and committed to writing at enormous length, precisely this view. Had it become public, he could have been removed from his positions and possibly prosecuted. He kept it secret with the same methodical care he applied to everything else. His theological manuscripts were sold at Sotheby's in 1936 for a few hundred pounds, and most of what we know about his private beliefs dates from their subsequent examination.

Quick answers

Common questions

Was Isaac Newton a Christian?

He described himself as one and engaged deeply with Christian scripture throughout his life. Whether his private theology — rejecting the Trinity and the co-divinity of Christ — would have been recognised as Christian by the Church of England he nominally belonged to is a different question. Newton thought the Church had corrupted the original faith. He saw himself as recovering it. Whether that counts as Christianity depends on who gets to define the term.

What did Isaac Newton say about God?

He said a great deal, across a great many documents, but one of his clearest public statements appears in the General Scholium appended to the second edition of Principia: 'This most beautiful system of the sun, planets, and comets, could only proceed from the counsel and dominion of an intelligent and powerful Being.' Newton did not hedge on this. He believed the universe required a creator and that his own work made that case more powerfully than any theological argument alone could.

Did Newton believe science and religion were in conflict?

No — and the question would have puzzled him. For Newton, investigating the laws of nature was a way of understanding God's creation, not a challenge to it. The conflict between science and religion is largely a product of the 19th century. In Newton's world, natural philosophy was understood by most of its practitioners as a form of devotion. Newton took this further than most: he genuinely believed that the mathematical order he uncovered was divine in origin and that uncovering it was, in some sense, a religious act.

Keep Exploring

More ways to keep going

Jump back to this shelf, browse generated topics, or let TinyThat choose the next question.